FBI Refutes Tucker Carlson Allegations About Attempted Trump Assassin
The FBI is pushing back on claims made by conservative commentator Tucker Carlson, rejecting his assertion that the bureau “lied” about details surrounding Thomas Crooks, the would-be assassin who attempted to kill President Donald Trump in 2024. Carlson had alleged that the FBI falsely stated Crooks had “no online footprint,” and he promised to release evidence disproving that claim, Newsweek reported.
The FBI Rapid Response account on X refuted Carlson’s accusation. “This FBI has never said Thomas Crooks had no online footprint. Ever,” the account wrote.
More than a year after the July 13, 2024, shooting, relatively little information has been publicly released about Crooks, the 20-year-old gunman who opened fire on Trump during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
Crooks fired eight rounds from an AR-15-style rifle while positioned on a nearby rooftop, killing one audience member and injuring two others before grazing Trump’s ear.A member of the U.S. Secret Service Counter Sniper Team returned fire and killed Crooks within seconds. The attack exposed major security failures and ultimately led to the resignation of Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle
An independent panel reviewing the incident later concluded the agency required “fundamental reform.”
On Friday at 8:00 a.m. ET, Carlson posted a 35-minute video on X that he claimed contained material the FBI “has worked hard to make sure you haven’t seen.”
The footage included a clip Carlson said came from Crooks’ Google Drive showing the gunman dry-firing a weapon in a room with paper targets taped to the wall.
Carlson said the video also highlighted Crooks’ alleged online activity, including YouTube comments and a range of digital accounts that may have belonged to him.
Carlson relied on a source who he said used Crooks’ phone number to identify a Gmail address, two additional email accounts, and accounts on Snapchat, Venmo, PayPal, Zelle, Discord, Google Play, Quizlet, Chess.com and Quora.
He argued these accounts demonstrated a “robust online presence,” which he said contradicted earlier statements from the FBI.
Carlson said the bureau asked whether he had verified the accounts, a response he described as “confusing” because “the authenticity is self-evident.”
The FBI Rapid Response account noted that the bureau as it exists today is not the same leadership that existed under the Biden administration.
The account was created in November 2025 and made its first post on November 13.
It has roughly 22,500 followers, including FBI Director Kash Patel and multiple national reporters, suggesting it is official but relatively new.Online users circulated a screenshot showing what appeared to be a Community Note attached to the FBI’s reply, but the note had apparently been removed.
The screenshot referenced a July 2024 comment by former FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate, but that statement would not contradict the Rapid Response account’s claim that “this” FBI had never made such remarks.
Carlson wrote on X on November 13, “The FBI told us Thomas Crooks tried to kill Donald Trump last summer but somehow had no online footprint. The FBI lied, and we can prove it because we have his posts. The question is why? Story tomorrow.”
The FBI Rapid Response account replied on November 14, “This FBI has never said Thomas Crooks had no online footprint. Ever.”
President Trump has to stop live speech as he rushed from podium after ‘medical emergency’
BREAKING: Trump Abruptly Halts Speech After Sudden Medical Emergency Inside White House
Washington, D.C. — What began as a routine national security briefing quickly turned into a moment of confusion and concern that left both the press and the public searching for answers.
President Donald Trump was in the middle of delivering remarks on rising global tensions, including warnings about Iran and nuclear threats, when the atmosphere in the room shifted dramatically. Witnesses describe a sudden break in focus—an interruption that escalated within seconds into what appeared to be a medical emergency.
Before most viewers at home could fully grasp what was happening, the live broadcast abruptly cut to black.
A Sudden Turn Behind Closed Doors
According to individuals present in the room, confusion spread rapidly. A child reportedly collapsed, triggering immediate alarm among those nearby. Among the first to react was Mehmet Oz, who moved swiftly toward the scene.
Observers noted that his response was immediate and instinctive—less that of a public figure, and more that of a concerned parent and trained physician. His wife, visibly shaken, added to the intensity of the moment unfolding just feet away from the podium.
At nearly the same time, Karoline Leavitt issued a firm directive to clear the room. Reporters were quickly ushered out, cutting off any chance for immediate clarification.
Silence Replaces Answers
Within moments, the press conference was officially terminated. No explanation was offered. No follow-up briefing was announced.
The abrupt end left a void—both in the room and across the nation. Viewers were left staring at blank screens, while journalists scrambled for details that, as of now, remain unconfirmed.
A Human Moment in a High-Stakes Setting
What makes the incident particularly striking is where it occurred: inside one of the most secure and controlled environments in the world. The Oval Office is typically a place of calculated messaging and strict protocol. Yet in this instance, those layers of control appeared to dissolve in an instant.The contrast was stark. Just seconds earlier, the focus had been on geopolitical threats and national defense. Suddenly, the narrative shifted to something far more immediate and personal—a family crisis unfolding in real time.
What Happens Next?
As of now, the White House has not released an official statement clarifying the nature of the emergency or the condition of those involved.
Until more information emerges, the public is left piecing together fragments:
A speech interrupted mid-sentence
A rushed response from a doctor and parent
A distressed family at the center of attention
And a room cleared with urgency and silence
In Washington, where every moment is usually scripted and controlled, this unexpected incident serves as a stark reminder: even at the highest levels of power, unpredictability can take over without warning.
10 Minutes ago in New York, Jenna Bush Hager was confirmed as...See more
10 Minutes Ago in New York — A New Update on Jenna Bush Hager Draws Attention
A developing update out of New York City is quickly gaining traction after reports surfaced just minutes ago involving Jenna Bush Hager. While early details remain limited, the confirmation has sparked immediate interest among viewers and followers who have long watched her role in media and public life.
Jenna Bush Hager, best known for her presence on morning television and her approachable on-screen style, has built a reputation as a trusted voice in American households. Her ability to connect with audiences—blending personal storytelling with broader conversations—has made her one of the more recognizable figures in daytime broadcasting.
According to initial reports, the confirmation relates to a new development that could influence her current role and future direction. While specifics are still emerging, sources indicate that the update may mark a notable shift, prompting speculation about what comes next for her career and public presence.
Those familiar with her work point out that Jenna has navigated multiple transitions over the years, balancing media responsibilities with her personal life and broader public engagement. Whether this latest confirmation represents a major change or a natural evolution remains to be seen, but it has clearly captured attention in the early moments following the announcement.
As more information becomes available, audiences are expected to gain a clearer picture of the situation and its potential impact. For now, the brief confirmation has done what such moments often do—spark curiosity, conversation, and anticipation about what lies ahead.
As reactions continue to build, many are closely watching how Jenna Bush Hager will address the update publicly. Moments like this often bring a mix of speculation and anticipation, especially for someone with a strong connection to a national audience. Viewers are eager to understand not just the confirmation itself, but what it could signal for her next chapter.
Behind the scenes, industry insiders suggest that developments like this don’t happen overnight. They are often the result of ongoing conversations, long-term planning, and evolving opportunities within the media landscape. If confirmed in full detail, this update could represent a strategic move—one that aligns with broader shifts in programming, audience engagement, or personal priorities.
At the same time, her supporters remain focused on her consistent presence and authenticity—qualities that have helped her maintain relevance in a fast-changing media environment. Whether this leads to a new role, an expanded platform, or a different direction entirely, the response so far shows that public interest remains strong.
For now, all eyes are on what comes next. As more details emerge and official statements are expected, this story is likely to develop further—offering a clearer view of what this confirmation truly means and how it may shape the road ahead.
