Disgraced Ex-Sen. Menendez Banned From Holding Any Public Office in NJ
14/09/2025 21:32
Former Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., has been permanently barred from holding public office in New Jersey following his conviction on federal corruption charges, the state attorney general announced.
Menendez, sentenced in January to 11 years in prison, is also prohibited from serving in any position of public trust by a ruling from New Jersey Superior Court Judge Robert Lougy, per Fox News.
A jury found Menendez guilty in July 2024 on 16 counts, including bribery, extortion, conspiracy, and obstruction of justice. He became the first U.S. senator in history to be convicted of acting as a foreign agent, and his 11-year sentence is the longest ever imposed on a member of the Senate.
“Critical to preserving the public’s faith and trust in government institutions is ensuring that elected officials who commit crimes involving their offices don’t find new opportunities to regain positions of power,” New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin said in a statement, per Fox.“Too many people in New Jersey have a cynical viewpoint that corruption is a routine, widespread feature of our politics. We hope the court’s decision sends a message that it is not acceptable, and it will carry consequences,” the statement continued.
Menendez, the former chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, will face a fourth-degree contempt-of-court charge if he attempts to seek public office or public employment in New Jersey, officials said.
Federal prosecutors alleged that Menendez and his wife, Nadine Menendez, accepted bribes between 2018 and 2022. According to the state attorney general’s office, the payments included gold bars, cash, a luxury convertible, home furnishings and other items of value.
Recommended for you
Prosecutors also accused Nadine Menendez of receiving paychecks for a job that did not actually exist.
Prosecutors say Menendez used his position in the Senate to advance the interests of those who provided the bribes, including by taking official actions that benefited foreign governments such as Egypt.
The indictment followed a plea agreement by co-defendant Jose Uribe, who allegedly provided Nadine Menendez with a Mercedes convertible. Uribe agreed to cooperate with investigators as part of his deal.
Menendez had pleaded his innocence and claimed the process was political and “corrupted to the core.”
“I hope President [Donald] Trump cleans up the cesspool and restores the integrity to the system,” Menendez told reporters at his sentencing, per Fox.
Menendez relinquished his role as the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 2024 after being charged but has rebuffed demands for his resignation. There is speculation that he would consider an independent reelection candidacy to raise funds, potentially to mitigate his increasing legal expenses.
Menendez’s legal expenses were escalating at the time, and sources pointed out that he could only raise funds if he ran for office. Using campaign funds to cover legal fees is not uncommon; NBC News previously reported that affiliated committees of then-former President Trump spent nearly $50 million from fundraising revenue on legal expenses in 2023 alone as Democratic prosecutors and the Biden administration pursued criminal cases against him.
Recommended for you
“A cornerstone of the foundation of American democracy and our justice system is the principle that all people are presumed innocent until proven guilty. The court of public opinion is no substitute for our revered justice system,” the Democrat senator said after he was charged.
“We cannot set aside the resumption of innocence for political expediency when the harm is irrevocable… Instead of waiting for all the facts to be presented, others have rushed to judgment because they see a political opportunity for themselves or those around them,” Menendez added at the time
Menendez also made it clear he did not intend to resign from the Senate: “Not only will I be exonerated, I will also still be NJ’s senior senator.”
Breaking: Barack Obama Just Confirmed in Washington, D.C. — Details Emerging
In a development that is quickly drawing attention across the country, Barack Obama has just been confirmed in an announcement made in Washington, D.C., according to early reports. The confirmation, which occurred only moments ago, has sparked widespread interest as officials and observers wait for more details about the situation.
Initial information suggests that the announcement was made during a briefing in the nation’s capital, where officials confirmed the update involving the former president. While the full context of the confirmation is still unfolding, the news has already begun circulating rapidly through political circles and media outlets.
Barack Obama, who served as the 44th president of the United States from 2009 to 2017, remains one of the most influential po
litical figures in modern American politics. Any official confirmation involving him tends to generate immediate public and media attention, both domestically and internationally.
Sources close to the situation say additional statements may be released soon, which could clarify the nature of the confirmation and what it could mean moving forward. Analysts are already speculating about possible implications, though officials have urged the public to wait for verified information.
For now, the announcement from Washington, D.C. marks a developing story. More updates are expected as authorities and representatives provide further details in the coming hours.
In a dramatic new court filing, Ghislaine Maxwell has claimed that at least 25 alleged accomplices connected to Jeffrey Epstein quietly reached “secret settlements” related to abuse allegations — yet were never criminally charged.
The filing, submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that newly discovered evidence reveals previously undisclosed agreements between plaintiff attorneys and multiple men who, according to Maxwell, could be considered co-conspirators in Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation.
“New evidence reveals that there were 25 men with whom the plaintiff lawyers reached secret settlements — that could equally be considered as co-conspirators,” Maxwell wrote in documents filed without the assistance of her legal team.
Maxwell, 63, is currently serving a 20-year federal sentence following her 2021 conviction on sex trafficking charges. In her latest submission, she maintains that prosecutors failed to disclose crucial information that could have altered the outcome of her trial.
“None of these men have been prosecuted and none has been revealed to me,” Maxwell wrote. “Had I known, I would have called them as witnesses.”
She further contends that the alleged concealment of these settlements — along with what she describes as jury bias — deprived her of a fair trial. According to Maxwell, if jurors had been informed of what she characterizes as “collusion” between government officials and civil attorneys, they may have reached a different verdict.
The filing also claims that four former employees of Epstein were referenced in both a prior non-prosecution agreement and the federal indictment he faced before his death in 2019, yet none of those individuals were ultimately charged.
The possibility that additional accomplices remain unidentified has reignited public scrutiny surrounding the Epstein case. Questions persist about whether the names of those who allegedly reached private settlements will ever be fully disclosed — particularly as federal authorities continue reviewing millions of pages of case-related documents.
To date, only Epstein and Maxwell have faced federal criminal charges directly tied to the sex-trafficking network. Others associated with Epstein have confronted civil lawsuits but have denied wrongdoing.
Among the most high-profile figures accused in civil proceedings was Prince Andrew, who was sued by Virginia Giuffre over allegations of sexual abuse when she was a minor. Prince Andrew has consistently denied the claims and later reached a financial settlement without admitting liability.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Justice has confirmed that hundreds of attorneys are reviewing an estimated 5.2 million pages of documents connected to the Epstein investigation. Officials say the review process is complex and requires extensive redactions to protect victims’ identities.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche stated in December that the review is an “all-hands-on-deck” effort, emphasizing that victim protection remains a top priority even as pressure mounts for greater transparency.
It remains unclear whether the 25 men referenced in Maxwell’s filing negotiated any agreements with federal prosecutors or whether their settlements were strictly civil in nature. Legal experts note that civil settlements do not automatically shield individuals from criminal liability — though non-prosecution agreements can.
Maxwell’s filing is widely viewed as part of her broader legal strategy to challenge her conviction. Whether the court will grant further hearings or consider the alleged new evidence remains to be seen.
The renewed claims have once again thrust the Epstein scandal into the national spotlight, raising persistent questions about accountability, transparency, and whether all those involved in the long-running abuse network have truly been brought to justice.
As document reviews continue and appeals move forward, the case remains one of the most controversial and closely watched criminal sagas in recent American history.